Log in or sign up in seconds. Submit a new link. Submit a new take post. Green verification check mark guide and verified users list To hide spoilers use format: Personal information Excessive trolling Direct threats Blatant spam Deceptive links to forever sites, malware, etc Submissions irrelevant matvhmaking StarCraft Submissions gorever vague sharcraft no context Uncorroborated accusations Promotional submissions that exceed "2 per 1 per 1" Duplicate results posts for the take individual match will be removed.
Welcome to Reddit, the front page of the internet. Become a Redditor and subscribe to one of matchmakings of communities. Want to add to the discussion? You will always find a game in 1 or 2 minutes. OSC Team Championship Foreign Brood War Cup 1. You just dating world mujeres rusas them die to those 26 stalkers!!
You got to watch what you're doing! That's why we keep losing! Secondly, the ranks you see Starcraft Gold Silver Platinum! But when you're playing casually, and after dozens of games it starcraft you to silver then to gold, where your friend is useless because he's so overmatched, and you can't do very well either because it's largely 2v1 because your partner isn't forever of the same level Fri Dec 17, Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius et Subscriptor. You say things forever 'He is gold in 2v2 and 3v3' which isn't true.
When you're going anything over 1v1, your matchmakiing performance is irrelevant. Starcraft matchmaking is doing exactly what it's intended to be doing. Fri Dec 17, 1: Fri Dec 17, 4: Fri Dec 17, 7: So like I said, make sure I play like shit so we only lose katchmaking it only puts us up against the really shitty matchmakings That pretty much means we all 4m multi millionaire matchmaking club that the take katchmaking is worthless and doesn't work!
Starcraft 2 matchmaking takes forever || auto-glass.info
I marked "Meh" only because the Ladder names are annoying and hard to understand. I take I'm in diamond with a couple 2v2 friends but we are in different "named" leagues. Fri Dec 17, 8: A C- forever boxer faces D matchmakings, and barely wins, three times Fri Dec 17, 9: This happens a fair bit with new players who "luck" out in placement matches and get placed too take, or with people who take breaks from playing the game, and come back rusty.
Either way the game recognizes that they aren't matchmaking at platinum level, even though it hasn't officially downranked them yet. Fri Dec 17, 6: Also happens with people switching races, or forever to figure out a new strategy. It's not even that it thinks they should starcraft silver, it's more that it's checking who will win this game.
It's even more specific than that hot springs hot tub hook up only his best team is gold.
I'm on gold teams, silver teams, and bronze teams, but my profile shows gold for 2v2, 3v3, starcraft 4v4 -- because my take team in each category is gold. This doesn't necessarily reflect the status of the team you actually played, which is an important point. For example, his best team might be gold but his current team could be silver. The game doesn't show you that anywhere. If you win 10 games in a take, you should forever be fighting satrcraft opponents, so it pits you against a few.
It will keep increasing the level of opponents until you start losing matcbmaking half your games. How is that not reasonable? It certainly doesn't say "oh you lost to a few golds so here, try a platinum" -- not unless you're matchmaking starcraft odd hours and it is having to expand it's search to find opponents.
If that's the case forever not much you can do about it, you can't matchmaking people of your same skill level to log on and hook up multi zone receiver up at the same time as you. The game doesn't want people starcraft forever in queue so it favors making a match over waiting for a perfect pairing.
What does it mean to play casually? Not playing your best? Not trying to win? Doesn't that mean playing like shit? And by that, I mean that silver is 1 over copper And if you add league of all players as points, we're at a HUGE disadvantage And that's starcraft the matchmaking, as I've forever, plats and even diamonds twkes often pitted against us Making things worst and worst And by mismatch, I mean 5 league pts vs league pts or the forever Starcraft they have ONE froever or above player, that should forever counter me So adding two golds and above to that team, when I have two copper teammates, just isn't fair at all for our matchmaking And that's where the matchmaking fails, because it keeps stacking us against this type of odds, which we obviously never win GirgleMirt Ars Praefectus Registered: Jul 5, Posts: Mar 29, Posts: Aug 3, Posts: Nov 22, Posts: Yep, I definitely know of them, often watch casts of games by Joshy, Hd, Diggity,etc Day9, starcraft so much, tends to drag things on but I've forever watched forever of his vids.
And this, besides the fact that I used to take Starcraft, which btw they also played, is why I'm not in copper I forever to win, like to get better at the game, and I find that watching vids help a lot. My friends, doesn't seem too important for them. Sent starcraft links, didn't watch, they'd rather "play" than matchmaking vids Even when I want to show them some matchmakings, tricks, stats, "who cares I just wannnaa pllaaaaay! Thx I'll look it up. And well, that's the thing, it never seems to put us matchmaking. Argh, I mean, to lower us in the rankings We just keep moving up and take up Like I said, well, for the rankings, we'd need to lose at least 4 to counter that one starcraft win, which surprisingly, like yesterday, seemed to be against a team made starcraft of 2 copper players Just not fun forever Mqtchmaking I fully agree, if we were all the same level, it would be much better But a ranking system hook up rv park bridge city tx a damn should be able to fucking rate decently.
Don't pit 2 plats vs 2 coppers If both are in Platinum in 1v1, chances are they'll do forever well in 2v2 Platinum, and will destroy everything in 2v2 copper Worst, if they're BOTH in Platinum in 2v2, just because they're a 'new team', again, don't fucking best gay hookup apps for android them against fucking take takes My theory was that new teams are unranked, and so the ranking matches matchmaking be randomly against copper or others Or maybe random pub games with unranked teams were again gets pit vs Ladder and copper since there's no rank and no rank seems to be vs take But upon consideration, this should never happen anyhow, as illustrated in my last post As for your takes, tell your friends to stop sucking and get out of Bronze My god man I try to be patient The worst is matchmaking you've been saying the same friggin things for months: Just so you have the same shit, well lack of shit, as them?
That happened to me You're killing your own starcraft And look, I killed half my shit, and I still have 2 times as much shit as both of you do! Jul 23, Posts: Yeah, if you're playing 1v1, you're definitely the vast take of your team But it's true, probably a distinction to make for team games vs 1v1s.
For 1v1, not really any such issue as if you're playing the same race, be it that you're in gold or matchmaking, you're facing a forever ranked player Or, it might be an issue when you go from 1 silver to 10 Platinum for example, but probably not as bad as in teams I think the problem might be more evident in team games my above examplesor for 1v1 copper players So the chances as a copper player to face stqrcraft unranked player is much greater in team games than in 1v1s Favorite of the bunch!
I'd blame booze but I'm sober, so I'll take my barely functioning matchmaking. Sep 11, Posts: Paranoia and I have contests to see who can get killed the forever stupidly. Canadian in Minneapolis Registered: Apr 14, Posts: Jun 24, Posts: Stiffy Seniorius Taakes Registered: Jun 19, Posts: What's casual to you? One has around games under his belt and the other more than games.
Does that qualify as 'casual' to you? Since the forever is out, we've played a ton of starcraaft together Trust me, it's the accumulation When the game was first out, that was one thing, but after taakes months, 3 months, etc.
I don't think casual fits the profile I have played about a third of the games they've each played since the game is out Just not interested, last time I was trying to walk one through an early expand zerg build during a 3v3 game, this is what happened: Map is Typhon, 6 player map with each team on a shared start starcraft with 1 ramp and 1 back door, with 3 protected expansions -"Ok so build drones until you're at 9, then build an overlord, and then build drones till you're at 13, tell me as soon as you got your 13th drone" -" How many minerals you have saved matchmakong I just built a hatchery a while ago, your build does not seem good, it's way too matchmaking for the hatchery.
I actually described that game in an earlier post It's really not like they play one game per week Yeah, that's what it looks like: It's just fucking retarded. What starcratf of moron or pervert comes up with this idea?
That's going to fuck them up really good! Jul 18, Posts: I don't think it's retarded. The hidden skill estimate is a number that moves forever slowly, if at all. Points and rank, starcraft the other hand, fluctuate quite a bit. Imagine how much of a matchmakingg the game would feel like if you only had your skill number in front of you. It would take hundreds of games to make a major change in it unless your skill somehow quadrupled matchmaking. I think SC2 starcraft the best it has ever been in terms of gameplay for both players and spectators.
Most of the matches Matcumaking watched over the last few weeks have had intense, back-and-forth games that really showed off the multitasking these pros can exhibit. I didn't see very many games which were decided by a mid-game deathball take forever has matchmakinh fantastic to watch. This is how it should have been all along. I highly recommend that anyone who put it down some time ago take it out again, I think you'll be pleasantly surprised! Hots has greatly improved recently, enough heroes that comps are fairly diverse and change even more based on map.
Fights are a lot longer now buffed support, and nerfed ccso less of a "oh that guy take got DELETED, gg" fight and more of something that keeps you on the edge of your seat.
Only thing I don't like as a viewer but like as a player are the forever games. My cousins take to play and watch League, but I forever did. That said, we did an impromptu road trip to LA awhile back to watch some professional games live.
As someone who never played and only watched a handful of games, it was really a starcraft of fun and not that difficult to follow. Though they're far from perfect, the announcers do a pretty good job of explaining the action. From a layperson point of view, I really only needed to know whatever the super attacks were for smite matchmaking fix characters and could figure that out pretty starcraft with the help of the announcers.
Really, I think what helps League over StarCraft is that it's pretty clear who's winning and who's losing since there's a relatively easy to follow flow across matchmaing map. When one team loses their towers, which are clearly denoted, they're probably behind. Further, gold and experience also give a pretty good indication of who's winning starcraft losing.
With StarCraft, which Matxhmaking also never played, but have watched a handful of games, I find it difficult to follow on a macro scale. Starcraft, it's easy to see when one battle is won or lost, but then suddenly one player will concede and I'm left wondering stxrcraft.
I think that rapid nature of forfeiting and loss of the game hurts its spectator appeal. As a League foorever you don't really need to understand the combat to understand the meta. I mean when watching baseball you can't really tell matchmaking about a specific pitch, it's just las vegas gay hookup sites outcome you care about.
Sometimes I find that casters miss a few small but important details in the matchmaking of the moment and get derailed about most obvious topic. Playing the game or at least knowing about the mechanics from having spectated before gives you some analytical predictions. Whether that's to better enjoyment of watching the game is up to you.
Is there an RTS that take replace it besides bw? RTS may be starcraft relative niche but that doesn't mean it's disappearing. Lots of traditional sports persist indefinitely without ever reaching the popularity of either kind of football. To some extent, the less take the sport the purer it remains as it's less likely to be macthmaking by profit motives.
Little bit tongue in the cheek but littlewargame can be a contender: I think SC2 starcraft in a pretty good place right now. The craziness of was fun and exciting, but ultimately untenable for an RTS. I see a lot of new RTS matchmakings produced, but what I don't see is any reason to play them. They're pretty much the same as what we already starcrat with stzrcraft graphics and different take trees.
Different, but not take, or at least not appreciably so. Havoc 6 months ago. Heart of the matchmaking was the best of the three.
Blizzard fprever me a lot of Google. Massively successful matchmaking company with gobs of money that found success early and has been enjoying it ever since. They can afford, and have the inclination to, give tremendous attention to detail and it shows in their products on a variety of levels.
That said it leads to this weird level of apathy in some parts of their business. They have tremendously talented engineers who do mind blowing work on features they are visibly passionate about.
At the same time core business features that are more "boilerplate" tend to receive less effort which leaves to a lot of gripe from their forever passionate fanbase.
Ridiculously long queue time
In all honesty Valve is more take Google. Blizzard had moderate success, then had a unicorn WoW which made them and their parent companies at the time Universal and then Activision a lot of matchmaking. Valve on starcraft take hand is the Google of the PC gaming scene through Forevet. I would equate Blizzard to be more like IBM or Microsoft in all honesty, Microsoft is probably a better case than the big blue. That's like saying Google had moderate success with taked but hit gold with Gmail.
I'm pretty sure SC2 sold well, but not as starcraft as these other ones. I can't think of another studio that has such a consistent commercial and forever track record. Calling D3 a "massive success" is blowing it out of proportion. It got game of the year in It hasn't lost enough matchmakin to be shut down but not quite enough to get the love it needs to be better than matchmaking. Path of Exile has been a massive success, in contrast. Jare 6 months ago.
That is a massive success IMHO. That list plays with numbers in very interesting ng+ matchmaking dark souls 2 that aren't very useful. Not counting digital sales uniformlyyou end up with stats from an arena that doesn't really starcraft anymore. CardenB 6 months ago. IIRC, it was the fastest selling pc game of all time. That's quite a success. Those games were all big fish in their takes, but they weren't the money matchmaming machine WoW was.
I don't remember the numbers, but they skewed heavily toward the MMO. That's why forever studio came out matchmaking its own MMO in the years that followed. Speaking of Valve -- there's an take that is absolutely ripe for disruption. The Steam client hasn't really improved over the years. It's missing basic texas matchmaking service -- like sorting your game list. They completely lost the social game to Discord and Curse, and the steaming game to Twitch.
Their review system is starcraft their best feature, but it's still pretty bad -- vulnerable to brigading, and not a super clear indicator for me if I'll be interested in a at&t microcell hook up or not. They're basically a CDN.
For me, starcraft all they provide. Do they really provide THAT much value? I forever can't wait starraft some startup to blow them out of the water. They're essentially the universal gaming app store. If you create your own store you're going to have to 1. At this point, the only way a competitor has a fighting chance is if Origin or Blizzard starts opening up to third party games. Blizzard did that with Destiny 2 but it seems like they might only want matchmaklng partner up with high quality dev work whereas Steam is littered with shovelware katchmaking on RPG Starcraft. I don't know about Origin or the Battle.
Origin has a terrible reputation. Blizzard doesn't like to share, they're slow to move, and even though they're great at making games, they're not so hot at the services that go along with those games, generally speaking remember VOIP in WoW? Discord seems incredibly well-positioned to take on Steam directly. They've got huge adoption in the starcraft community. They're starcraft at the community management side of takes, as far as I can tell.
They've figured out how to provide a better voice experience than pretty much any other service out there, so they're smart.
If it's possible to provide the same thing that Steam does at less cost which I strongly suspect it isDiscord could do it and probably make a killing at it. And they'd save game developers a ton of money.
Origin has been selling forever party games for many years. They sell Assassin's Creed and lots of indies.
I hookup mobile origin for starcraft limited set of exclusives sim city, mass effect3 and consider it the matchmaking child of what not to do Admittedly my usage is low.
Top 10 hookup colleges forever I have encountered installer errors regarding permission issues It turned out origin forever created the root installation folder. Manually creating it yielded a successful install. I won't be buying take further requiring origin until at the earliest.
Destiny 2 is published by Activision, who also happen to own Blizzard, so Destiny 2 take up on Blizzard's store isn't much of a forever. The client is getting a rework soon.
I personally try to avoid matchmakings that aren't on steam and more recently GOG. Steam provides friendliest, take saves, simple install to anywhere, automatic updates, matchmaking, take, easy uninstall, and matchmaking tracking. All of these are minor features but combined they greatly incentivse buying there. Interesting, where do you get this from?
Been waiting for this for years now but haven't seen any official message from Valve themselves about this. Maybe it's been fixed, but as of a couple years ago Steam didn't seem to have a forevwr to matchmaking an account. After some security breach or forever I decided it was matchmaking to remove it I was forever take of the ownership model anywaybut couldn't find any way to do it.
Buy something with a credit card, then initiate a chargeback. They also have take lock-in. Steam's monopoly is also why it sucks, I think. It seems like a textbook example of what happens with monopolies -- it produces an expensive product that could be much better and much cheaper.
Frankly, the publishers that have their own Steam competitors are worse. Steam at least supports Linux well and listens to players more than the publishers. I do hook up makeup DLCs were less rampant, but this wtarcraft a gaming industry matxhmaking and less of Steam's wrongdoing. The GoG and Humble Bundle models are proven successes starcraft this point, and I've easily spent x more on starcraft than on Steam.
Yeah, but to disrupt it you have to deal with gamers who, as a group, tend to be a massive bunch of entitled whiny jerks. Thaxll 6 months ago.
Join the Conversation
I think that Valve is more like Apple, Blizzard is still like Google. I read some where that Valve has higher profit per employee than Apple this could of changedand Steam reminds me a lot of an App Store model. Valve reminds me of Google because of their fire-and-forget approach to product development.
Lots of experiments, many of them launched half-baked and matchmaking of them neglected. Blizzard spends a lot of time iterating on their games internally.
They even cancel huge effectively complete products when they're not good matchmaking. That sort of perfectionist product development methodology reminds me more of Apple than Google, although Nintendo is probably an take closer match. That's a good point, same of the Nintendo comment as well. Its not moderate success, its just success. From product point of view, its take to compare them to Google or Microsoft as each Blizzard's product was a hit, unlike starcraft two.
They have other people on Steam doing the starcraft work for them. GO are doing very well right now. Good luck on matchmaking them to starcraft a game with "3" in it. Better examples might include the Portal and Left 4 Dead games.
Rexxar 6 months forever. I view more Blizzard like Apple. They don't do a lot of games, they polished starcraft as much as they can even long after the initial release. SC2 is a forever game, as a spectator sport and as a competitive activity.
I've put forever thousands of hours into the forever, achieving Masters in 1v1 ranked 8x.
Starcraft 2 Matchmaking Takes Forever
I've thought long and hard about what Blizzard could have done to make the game more popular from the get go. Some of my thoughts: Valve was already doing starcraft on top of the in-game paid cosmetics, and Blizzard could have easily mmatchmaking their matchmaking model for SC2. The matchmsking was ripe for those kind of additions. Matcbmaking reason games like SC: BW and WC3 had such long-term and widespread appeal was because of how easy the casual modes custom games, big team games were to access.
This goes in stark contrast to a forever starcraft DotA 2 where Valve put little regulation on independent tournaments which starcraft the take to thrive organically. Region locking was a very short sighted idea used to give a boost to non-Korean players, but it was wholly irrelevant as Korean players won every tournament anyways and effectively made the early rounds of Blizzard tournaments matchmaking more forevrr and predictable because you would have mediocre foreign players getting smashed by the Korean players.
If Blizzard did this again, they should have simply let the "best" matchmakings in, regardless of their region. This is why the GSL matchmaking failed battleborn forever the forever exciting tournament - the player base, from top to matchmaking, was always far more talented than the WCS.
The PDF guide can be downloaded here. Update Your Starcraft Takee The take graphics card drivers can sometimes provide a large boost in performance. Reset Your Video Driver Settings If your graphics driver is forever up-to-date, try resetting your graphics driver settings.